So, I don't usually get into conversations with the well minded elderly folk, for the simple reason that I can't seem to buy their views and beliefs on a number of contemporary issues. I am careful to keep my distance from them, save the customary greetings and not delve any more deeper. Call me a snob if you will but more often than not I find my blood boiling over after such interactions or rather monologues.
Recently however I got cornered by a very well minded elder, perhaps at an unfortunate hour. He insisted on enlightening me about the importance of sons in a family. I wasn't too keen on the discussion as I am the older of only two sisters and have never really missed out on having a brother. Neither did my parents ever display any sort of disappointment in not having produced a male progeny. So most of what he said, didn't accrue to my train of thought. I listened to his discourse however so as not to upset him.
His concerns were as follows. His foremost concern was ending of the family name. He said, "With girls, the family name gets lost as they get married and take up the husband's family name." "True", I said. "But it is no longer de rigueur for a woman to change her last name after marriage. Many continue to keep their maiden names or simply append the new surname." He wasn't convinced with my argument. He began explaining the concept of marriage wherein the girl leaves behind her maiden name and gotra and takes up the new ones and that it is an indisputable tradition. Case closed.
His second concern was that if there are no sons who will take care of the parents? "Daughters can't be always there for their parents. And the son's responsibility towards his parents is more than that of a daughter's. You might have male cousins but they will only care for their families not their uncle's or aunt's." Well what do I say to that? Aren't women nowadays taking equal responsibility of their parents at par with sons? They are economically independent and in a position to take care of their families.
His next concern had to do with the cycle of rebirth. This one was new for me so I paid close attention. He said that having sons increased your chances of being born again on earth as opposed to having only daughters. In the latter case, parents achieve moksha or salvation. This is in lieu of the religious rites and annual death ceremonies carried out by the sons, wherein they call upon the souls of their forefathers. I couldn't argue with that. All I could say was, " Isn't it better to be free from this tough and arduous life once and for all rather than be born again and again? Spiritually speaking. " once again having a daughter is a win win.
Now this doesn't go to say that there is no hope for daughters. They are loved and cherished. But sadly they don't have a voice. They have been and are still gagged by the societal veil of myriad customs and traditions. The funny part is that a daughter, even before she can be a girl, is treated as 'paraya dhan' or a liability. More than her personal safety we are greatly concerned about her family's respect. In many cases, women are reduced to mere objects for upholding the dignity and integrity of society.
A couple of months back, this viral video by AIB on the truth of arranged marriages was doing the rounds and shared on my Facebook page. I did catch their video. And it's awesome and true to every detail. We might bask in the glory of advancements and development but reality is a far cry from these.






